I’m writing today about an issue that deeply touches my reading audience:
Movies.
Movies.
At a number of different times in my life I have been asked what my favorite movie is. I usually respond with a 30 minute monologue about films and filmmakers; much to the dismay of the person who was really only asking to make small talk.
The most difficult thing when discussing movies (or any art form, for that matter) is to keep the objective separate from the subjective. You may ask, “What the heck does that mean?” Well, if you’d be patient I’ll tell you!
An objective comment is a fact; it is something that is true no matter what the individual may think. A subjective comment is an opinion; it is subject to the individual and changes from person to person.
So here are some practical examples:
OBJECTIVE
The fire is warm.
SUBJECTIVE
I like a warm fire.
OBJECTIVE
The sky is blue.
SUBJECTIVE
The sky looks pretty.
OBJECTIVE
You smell like a baboon’s hindquarters.
SUBJECTIVE
You smell good.
As you can see subjective opinions do not always have to be grounded in truth, but objective facts usually answer to some law of science or nature. You may ask, “What the heck does that have to do with movies?” Man, do your questions get annoying.
OBJECTIVE
The fire is warm.
SUBJECTIVE
I like a warm fire.
OBJECTIVE
The sky is blue.
SUBJECTIVE
The sky looks pretty.
OBJECTIVE
You smell like a baboon’s hindquarters.
SUBJECTIVE
You smell good.
As you can see subjective opinions do not always have to be grounded in truth, but objective facts usually answer to some law of science or nature. You may ask, “What the heck does that have to do with movies?” Man, do your questions get annoying.
One of my biggest pet peeves is when someone tells me they’ve just seen a new movie and when I ask them how it was, they tell me, “I liked it.” That tells me little or nothing about the movie. I liked it tells me about you but I wasn’t asking about you I was asking about the movie. When speaking about movies (and as a general practice) we need to be more selective in the language we choose. We need to differentiate between the good (objective) and likable (subjective). Obsoive:
OBJECTIVE
"The Sixth Sense" used excellent story telling techniques to disguise the true nature of its main character.
SUBJECTIVE
I liked "The Sixth Sense".
OBJECTIVE
"Cast Away" is a stirring tale about the nature of mankind and his capacity to persevere.
SUBJECTIVE
"Cast Away" is a boring movie.
OBJECTIVE
"Gone With The Wind" is an epic period piece set against the back drop of the American Civil War.
SUBJECTIVE
"Gone With The Wind" is an enjoyable film.
Once again you can see that subjective opinions are not always grounded in truth. But the objective facts can not be argued against…not unless the person wants to look like a fool. Personally I don’t like (subjective) "Dr. Zhivago" but I have to concede that it is (objective) a well made movie. On the other hand I happen to really like (subjective) "Ernest Goes to Camp" although I do have to admit that it is (objective) pretty dumb. Now you may ask, “What the heck does that have to do with me?” Alright, this is the last time I’m going answer you!
I want you, the readers, to tell me what you think are the top three best movies you’ve seen. Not necessarily you favorite (subjective) three, but what are the best made (objective) movies you can think of. Try to remember things like acting, special effects, story telling, direction, cinematography, costumes, score, timing and delivery, originality, and overall message. All or some of these things must work together to make a good movie. Make your list and post it as a comment to this blog and we’ll see what movies take the “Meatballs and Ravioli Oscar.”
4 comments:
It is someone fitting that the first comment I should leave on your site should be a quibble. But, are the story telling techniques in Sixth Sense objectively "excellent", or do you just personally think they are, while others might think they are so-so? And, is Cast Away objectively a "stirring" tale, or were you just stirred by it? And, how do you know?
I think the record shows that "The Sixth Sense" told the story exceptionally well, or else the movie would have been a wash out. The little "twist" at the end is what makes it worth seeing.
As far as "Cast Away" being stirring, I don't kow a lot of people who weren't "stirred" by it, but it is still objectively about mankind's perseverence.
Also, did you mean "somewhat" fitting?
Hmm...I would probably have to say...
Pans Labyrinth - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqYiSlkvRuw - Sooooooo boring...rather shoot myself in the head then watch it again, but then again, my imagination ran away with the trailer and it was 100% NOT what I was expecting. However, it was a well done movie with an apparently good story and fantastic costumes (such as eyeball guy and Pan).
Samurai X - http://www.imdb.com/video/screenplay/vi3028615449/
Cowboy Bebop Movie - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Au1AO1xaEts
Both of these have well done animation, story, and music. It also helps that in Samurai X blood flows like water, but hey, gotta have something fun in a movie if your gonna spend 3 hours on it ^.^
Hmm...actually, it looks as if my post is being way too subjective, and a bit too harsh...
Seems hard to distance the two views sometimes. If I like a movie, I tend to look upon it more favorably, but if I dislike one, like Pans, it's going to be harder for me to say something good about the story (although not so much other things, such as the creatures that were built, which were fantastic. The ones that were CG were a little fake looking, like the frog and the faries. Seems like a texture problem on them, which is odd considering the detail in Pan, and the frog seemed very over-animated.)
Also, it seems not only our bias about the movie itself will influence us, but our knowledge of techniques. eg: I know nothing on storytelling, so I won't be able to notice/enjoy all the little things going on someone well versed in storytelling will be able to notice.
Post a Comment